Comments on: Not an Editor http://shallowthinker.com/2009/08/not-an-editor/ No deep thoughts here...try somewhere else. Tue, 22 May 2012 01:11:14 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Alana http://shallowthinker.com/2009/08/not-an-editor/comment-page-1/#comment-23748 Alana Sun, 30 Aug 2009 18:55:10 +0000 http://shallowthinker.com/?p=1573#comment-23748 All I can say is that I'm extremely offended by the paragraph. It was narrow, closed, missed the point, and was, er, um, overly simplistic and other negative stuff. And all because of that closing line. It was just such a giant mistake I can't even get past it to see the possible message. If only you'd left it off, things might be different... All I can say is that I’m extremely offended by the paragraph. It was narrow, closed, missed the point, and was, er, um, overly simplistic and other negative stuff. And all because of that closing line. It was just such a giant mistake I can’t even get past it to see the possible message.

If only you’d left it off, things might be different…

]]> By: JPLand http://shallowthinker.com/2009/08/not-an-editor/comment-page-1/#comment-22528 JPLand Fri, 14 Aug 2009 20:38:54 +0000 http://shallowthinker.com/?p=1573#comment-22528 I don't know what you mean by that. I don’t know what you mean by that.

]]> By: Queen Kelley http://shallowthinker.com/2009/08/not-an-editor/comment-page-1/#comment-22527 Queen Kelley Fri, 14 Aug 2009 20:15:25 +0000 http://shallowthinker.com/?p=1573#comment-22527 Sorry, honey, but in most cases I think number 2 is the more appropriate moral. Sorry, honey, but in most cases I think number 2 is the more appropriate moral.

]]> By: Chris http://shallowthinker.com/2009/08/not-an-editor/comment-page-1/#comment-22525 Chris Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:10:51 +0000 http://shallowthinker.com/?p=1573#comment-22525 Did you also debate the relative merits of the Oxford comma? Because if you did, that would take your grammar geekiness to an entirely new plane. Did you also debate the relative merits of the Oxford comma? Because if you did, that would take your grammar geekiness to an entirely new plane.

]]>